Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Chávez-Bustamante, Felipe
dc.contributor.author Rojas-Mora, Julio
dc.contributor.author Wong, Sulan
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-12T03:46:01Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-12T03:46:01Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06
dc.identifier.issn 0160-791X
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0002-3157-9970/work/159803641
dc.identifier.other Mendeley: 39e8761b-c0a3-32e6-ba30-a027e1617f18
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/11833
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
dc.description.abstract This study aims to understand the relationship between academic patenting and secrecy in three key areas: the delay in publishing patentable results, the refusal of requests for research outcomes, and the perception of patent clarity drafting. Based on a dataset of Chilean university researchers, we conduct logistic regression models to understand the propensity to delay the publishing of patentable results, the probability of denying requests for research outcomes, and the likelihood of researchers perceiving their patents as clearly drafted. Controls used relate to the seniority of the researcher, the scientific field, whether the university is private or public, and whether the researcher previously worked with industry. Additionally, some constructs reflecting the researcher's perception regarding the patenting system within academic research were obtained through exploratory factor analysis and then incorporated as controls. The analysis reveals a positive correlation between prior patenting experience and publication delay. However, we found no correlation between previous patenting and the propensity to reject requests for research results. Both behaviors were negatively correlated to researcher seniority, gauged by the h-index, and positively correlated to forestry and agricultural technology sciences activity. Researchers who experienced denial of their requests were more likely to reciprocate refusal. Notably, a negative perception of the patent system within academic research was associated with a belief in drafting clearer patents. These findings suggest an environment of selective openness in academic networks, with researchers balancing full disclosure and secrecy. The paper studies three dimensions of secrecy in academic patenting through the novel data set. This study deepens our understanding of academic patenting practices, uncovering some complex dynamics shaping knowledge diffusion within universities. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 77 Issue: Pages:
dc.source Technology in Society
dc.title Balancing Act: Navigating the Tensions Between Patenting Practices and Open Science in Chilean Academic Research en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102584
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Economía y Gobierno


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar


Listar

Mi cuenta