Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
dc.contributor.author Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.author Román-Veas, Javier
dc.contributor.author Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Juan
dc.contributor.author Hagert, Elisabet
dc.contributor.author Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-12T03:46:16Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-12T03:46:16Z
dc.date.issued 2024-09
dc.identifier.issn 0031-9406
dc.identifier.other Mendeley: 8c46c7e7-4c7e-32bc-9fe5-8a004e0b149a
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/11849
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy
dc.description.abstract Objective: To determine in the long term whether supervised physiotherapy is more effective than a home exercise program for functional improvement and pain relief in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A total of 74 patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF were randomly allocated into two groups. Interventions: The experimental group received 6 weeks of supervised physiotherapy (n = 37) and the control group received 6 weeks of home exercise program (n = 37). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was wrist/hand function assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire; secondary outcomes were the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength and wrist flexion–extension active range of motion. Results: All patients completed the trial. For the primary outcome, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, the PRWE questionnaire showed a mean difference between groups of 18.6 (95% CI 12.8 to 24.3) and 18.5 points (95% CI 12.7 to 24.2) respectively, these differences are clinically important. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up this effect decreases to 3.3 points (95% CI −2.4 to 9.0). For secondary outcomes, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, in all measurements the effect size range from medium to large. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up only grip strength showed large effect size in favor of supervised physiotherapy, the rest of outcomes did not show difference between groups. Conclusion: At the 6-week and 1-year follow-up, supervised physiotherapy was more effective for functional improvement and pain relief compared with a home exercise program in patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF. However, this effect decreases over time, at the 2-year follow-up, only grip strength showed a difference in favor of supervised physiotherapy. Trial registration: Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN no. U1111- 1249-2492. Registered 17 March 2020. Contribution of the Paper: • Current evidence has shown controversial results regarding the effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy versus a home exercise program in elderly patients with DRFs. • At the 6-week and 1-year follow-up, supervised physiotherapy is more effective for functional improvement and pain relief. • However, at the 2-year follow-up, only grip strength showed a difference in favor of supervised physiotherapy in these patients. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 124 Issue: Pages: 93-100
dc.source Physiotherapy
dc.title Effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy versus a home exercise program in patients with distal radius fracture : a randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.physio.2024.03.005
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar


Listar

Mi cuenta