Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Lasserre, Diego Pérez | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-26T00:27:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-26T00:27:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2228-2009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/12231 | |
dc.description | Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Estonian Association for the History and Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.abstract | this article examines legal judgments in light of the two ways that, according to Kant, the Power of Judgment operates. After analyzing both uses of this faculty, it justifies that legal decisions can be considered as a type of reflective judgments, but not as exemplary as the ones treated in the Critique of the Power of Judgment—namely, the aesthetic and teleological. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | vol. 7 Issue: no. 3 Pages: 23-41 | |
dc.source | Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum | |
dc.title | Determining and reflective judgments : Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions | en |
dc.type | Artículo de revisión | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02 | |
dc.publisher.department | Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales | |
dc.publisher.department | Facultad de Derecho y Gobierno |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |