Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | García-Huidobro, Joaquín | |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez Lasserre, Diego | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-26T00:28:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-26T00:28:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1130-0507 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/12259 | |
dc.description | Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Universidad de Murcia Servicio de Publicaciones. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.abstract | This work aims to justify that, although it is true that there are differences between Aristotelian and Schmittian philosophy, there is a point of connection between both in what refers to prudence. In particular, we intend to demonstrate that in Schmitt’s description of the role of the judge in Law and Judgment (1912) and On the three types of juristic thought (1934) ideas of the practical philosophy of the Stagirite are present. | en |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.source | Daimon | |
dc.title | Acoger la excepción. La prudencia del juez como punto de conexión entre las ideas schmittianas y aristotélicas | es |
dc.title.alternative | Embrace the exception. The prudence of the judge as a point of connection between Schmittian and Aristotelic ideas | en |
dc.type | Artículo | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6018/DAIMON.373451 | |
dc.publisher.department | Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales | |
dc.publisher.department | Facultad de Derecho y Gobierno |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |