Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Angarita Dávila, Lissé Chiquinquirá
dc.contributor.author López Miranda, José
dc.contributor.author Aparicio Camargo, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Parra Zuleta, Karla
dc.contributor.author Uzcátegui González, María
dc.contributor.author Céspedes Nava, Virginia
dc.contributor.author Durán Agüero, Samuel
dc.contributor.author Reyna Villasmil, Nadia
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-26T00:32:26Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-26T00:32:26Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.issn 0212-1611
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/12523
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2017, Grupo Aula Medica S.A. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of two formulas with the same glucose content with different sweeteners and dietary fiber for diabetics in healthy adults and in patients with type-2 diabetes (DM2). Methodology: In this randomized, double-blind crossover research, eleven healthy people and six with DM2 consumed two enteral formulas, Glucerna SR®, Laboratorios Abbott C.A. (GF) and Enterex Diabetic®, Victus C.A. (EF), sweetened with fructose y sucralose, with 1.2 and 1.3 g/100 ml of fiber source respectively (four times). Additionally, they consumed glucose solution once, obtaining blood samples at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min for controls; in the diabetics, minutes 150 and 180 were added for measuring blood glucose, basal and postprandial insulin after two and three hours. Results: The incremental area under the curve (IAUC) was lower for the formulas rather than for SG. In the healthy controls was 12,857 ± 422 for EF and 11,601 ± 272 for GF (p < 0.014). In diabetics, this curve reduced for GF (28,656 ± 123) compared to EF (29,855 ± 496) (p < 0.01). The IG resulted in 58.07 ± 8.4 and 60.7 ± 2 for GF and EF, respectively, in the controls, and 65.16 ± 0.2 and 68.06 ± 1 in diabetics, without significant differences, as well as in post-prandial insulin. Conclusions: The GI and the GL of the two formulas resulted in an intermediate value in both groups, with a glycemic profile inferior to SG. No significant differences were observed regarding insulin behavior, showing that the absorption rate of carbohydrates in these formulas is slower, with a lower glycemic impact than the pattern product; thus, making its indication acceptable for the diabetic patient. en
dc.language.iso spa
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 34 Issue: no. 3 Pages: 532-539
dc.source Nutricion Hospitalaria
dc.title Índice glicémico, carga glicémica e insulina posprandial a dos fórmulas isoglucídicas con distintos edulcorantes y fibra en adultos sanos y diabéticos tipo 2 es
dc.title.alternative Glycemic index, glycemic load and insulin response of two formulas of isoglucose with different sweeteners and dietary fiber in healthy adults and type-2 diabetes en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.20960/nh.654
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem