Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Contreras, Hector
dc.contributor.author Alarcón-Zapata, Pedro
dc.contributor.author Nova-Lamperti, Estefania
dc.contributor.author Ormazabal, Valeska
dc.contributor.author Varas-Godoy, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Salomon, Carlos
dc.contributor.author Zuniga, Felipe A.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-26T00:37:38Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-26T00:37:38Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.issn 2673-3013
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/12871
dc.description Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Contreras, Alarcón-Zapata, Nova-Lamperti, Ormazabal, Varas-Godoy, Salomon and Zuniga.
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are secreted from all types of cells and are involved in the trafficking of proteins, metabolites, and genetic material from cell to cell. According to their biogenesis and physical properties, EVs are often classified as small EVs (including exosomes) or large EVs, and large oncosomes. A variety of methods are used for isolated EVs; however, they have several limitations, including vesicle deformation, reduced particle yield, and co-isolate protein contaminants. Here we present an optimized fast and low-cost methodology to isolate small EVs (30–150 nm) from biological fluids comparing two SEC stationary phases, G200/120 and G200/140 columns. Methods: The optimization parameters considered were a) the selection of the stationary phase, b) the eluate volume per fraction, and c) the selection of the enriched 30–150 nm EVs-fractions. The efficiency and separation profile of each UF/SEC fraction was evaluated by Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), flow cytometry, total protein quantification, and Western blot. Results: Both columns can isolate predominantly small EVs with low protein contaminants from plasma, urine, saliva, and HEK293-derived EV from collection medium. Column G200/ 40 offers a more homogeneous enrichment of vesicles between 30 and 150 nm than G200/120 [76.1 ± 4.4% with an average size of 85.9 ± 3.6 nm (Mode: 72.8 nm)] in the EV collection medium. The enrichment, estimated as the vesicle-to-protein ratio, was 1.3 × 1010 particles/mg protein for G200/40, obtaining a more significant EVs enrichment compared to G200/120. The optimized method delivers 0.8 ml of an EVs-enriched-outcome, taking only 30 min per sample. Using plasma, the enrichment of small EVs from the optimized method was 70.5 ± 0.18%, with an average size of 119.4 ± 6.9 nm (Mode: 120.3 nm), and the enrichment of the vesicle isolation was 4.8 × 1011 particles/mg protein. The average size of urine and saliva -EVs samples was 147.5 ± 3.4 and 111.9 ± 2.5 nm, respectively. All the small EVs isolated from the samples exhibit the characteristic cup-shaped morphology observed by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Discussion: This study suggests that the combination of methods is a robust, fast, and improved strategy for isolating small EVs. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 5 Issue: Pages:
dc.source Frontiers in Nanotechnology
dc.title Comparative study of size exclusion chromatography for isolation of small extracellular vesicle from cell-conditioned media, plasma, urine, and saliva en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fnano.2023.1146772
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem