Universidad San Sebastián  
 

Repositorio Institucional Universidad San Sebastián

Búsqueda avanzada

Descubre información por...

 

Título

Ver títulos
 

Autor

Ver autores
 

Tipo

Ver tipos
 

Materia

Ver materias

Buscar documentos por...




Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Gabrysch, Caroline
dc.contributor.author Sepúlveda, Carolina
dc.contributor.author Bienzobas, Carolina
dc.contributor.author Mundt, Adrian P.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-26T00:40:16Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-26T00:40:16Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06-08
dc.identifier.issn 1664-1078
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/13056
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2020 Gabrysch, Sepúlveda, Bienzobas and Mundt.
dc.description.abstract Background: Severe mental illness (SMI) among imprisoned individuals is a global health concern. Quantitative research indicates on average mental health symptom improvements during imprisonment, however, it cannot reflect multifaceted factors influencing the course of SMI. This study aimed to explore the subjective course of SMI during imprisonment and to identify influencing factors. Methods: The study has a 3-year-follow-up design of imprisoned individuals in Chile. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 men and 9 women at follow-up who had either major depression or psychosis (severe mental illnesses) at baseline. We included individuals who deteriorated, remained stable or improved their mental health according to quantitative assessments. We explored the subjective course of their mental health condition during the follow-up period. Qualitative data was transcribed and coded using NVivo Software for quantitative content analysis. Qualitative data was also manually coded and was subsequently analyzed using the thematic analysis method with an inductive approach. We developed the final themes using the results of this analysis in combination with the inclusion criteria. Results: The mental health of 10 individuals subjectively improved, 6 experienced deteriorations, and 3 did not perceive any change. Good infrastructure, structure/occupation, intrapersonal resources (will to change, spirituality) and supportive relationships were identified as factors improving mental health. Factors deteriorating mental health were identified as bad infrastructure (e.g., no running water and bad housing conditions) and crowding, lack of psychological treatment, exposure to violence, interpersonal stress (conflictive relationships and separation from family), perceived injustice through sentencing, intrapersonal stressors and previous medical conditions. Discussion: SMI in prison can improve in a supportive environment under certain conditions. These conditions include the improvement of infrastructure (housing and healthcare), the opportunity to work or study, protection from violence during imprisonment, and to develop intrapersonal resources and family relationships. To reduce SMI in prisons the improvement of these conditions should become a priority. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof vol. 11 Issue: Pages:
dc.source Frontiers in Psychology
dc.title ‘Maybe It Is Only in Prison That I Could Change Like This’ The Course of Severe Mental Illnesses During Imprisonment – A Qualitative 3-Year Follow-Up Study From Chile en
dc.type Artículo
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01208
dc.publisher.department Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem